Option 1: How does the bureaucracy affect your life and freedom as an ordinary citizen? In what ways does it hinder or help your life? Do you see the bureaucracy as an effective aspect in your life, or do you see issues with the bureaucracy as it stands? Why/why not? List one issue you would change concerning the bureaucracy and how you would remedy the issue.
Short on Time? Get Expert Nursing Help
Our nursing writers can handle your essay, care plan or case study from start to finish.
OR
Option 2: Identify a recent decision by the U.S. Supreme Court and discuss the nature of the case and the basis of the argument the Supreme Court used to reach the decision. Explain why you agree or disagree with the ruling?
You may choose either Option 1 or 2 for your Follow-Up post.
Respond to at least one peer.
Further the dialogue by providing more information and clarification.
Include a minimum of 1 scholarly source meaningfully to demonstrate much depth. A scholarly source can include your textbook, assigned readings, or additional scholarly research.
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022) and Roe v. Wade (1973) – A Bloated Bureaucracy and an Inclusive Supreme Court Discussion
In the case Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022), the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the decision made in Roe v. Wade (1973), which had previously protected a woman’s right to an abortion. The Mississippi law at issue banned most abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy. The Court ruled that the Constitution does not explicitly guarantee the right to an abortion, so individual states can now establish their own abortion laws (NPR, 2022).
I completely disagree with this ruling and find it disturbing that the Supreme Court of the United States has decided to take this stance in regard to abortion laws. I find this ruling to be concerning because it leads to abortion laws that differ significantly from state to state, making it harder for women to access abortion services. This is troubling, especially when one considers a pregnancy that may have developed due to less than desirable circumstances such as rape or incest. Additionally, overturning Roe v. Wade disrupts decades of legal protections and could set a precedent for further challenges to other rights based on evolving judicial views (Center for Reproductive Rights, 2022). Federal protection of abortion rights helps ensure consistent access and supports individual freedoms across the country Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022) and Roe v. Wade (1973) – A Bloated Bureaucracy and an Inclusive Supreme Court Discussion.
References
Center for Reproductive Rights. (2022). Legal analysis of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health
Organization. Retrieved from https://www.reproductiverights.org/document/legal-analysis-Links to an external site.
of-dobbs-v-jackson-womens-health-organization/
NPR. (2022). Supreme Court Overturns Roe v. Wade. Retrieved from
https://www.npr.org/2022/06/24/1106746813/supreme-court-overturns-roe-v-wade
Discussion Response: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022) and Roe v. Wade (1973) – A Bloated Bureaucracy and an Inclusive Supreme Court Discussion
Hello,
I like that your discussion post explores the issue of an inclusive Supreme Court, noting that the ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022) reversed the ruling in Roe v. Wade (1973). In addition, I like that you point out the key features of this ruling, noting that it calls into question a woman’s right to abortion while allowing individual states to enact abortion laws based on their interpretation of the Constitution. Besides that, I like that you identify the potential for significant differences in abortion laws across the USA, noting that it would make it harder for women to access abortion services. Furthermore, I like that you indicate that overturning Roe v. Wade (1973) disrupts the 50 years of legal protections that women enjoy, and sets a precedent for further challenges to other rights. While your discussion post is well presented, I feel that it can be improved. The ruling by the Supreme Court adds discriminatory obstacles to access to care for disadvantaged groups who experience a higher risk of limited access to healthcare than the general population. The Hyde Amendment of 1976 banned federal funding for abortion with the result that persons from disadvantaged groups could not use a federal funded insurance for abortion procedures. The ruling made in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022) implies that more obstacles are made in access to care as they not only have to pay for the abortion procedure, but they also have to travel to states where the procedure may be permitted to access the service. The ruling allows a ban and restrictions on abortion that impact the ability of women to access the full range of reproductive healthcare services (Kaufman et al., 2022; Manninen, 2023). Overall, your discussion post is well presented but can be improved by including the mentioned point Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022) and Roe v. Wade (1973) – A Bloated Bureaucracy and an Inclusive Supreme Court Discussion.
References
Kaufman, R., Brown, R., Martínez Coral, C., Jacob, J., Onyango, M., & Thomasen, K. (2022). Global impacts of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization and abortion regression in the United States. Sexual and reproductive health matters , 30 (1), 2135574. https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2022.2135574
Manninen B. A. (2023). A Critical Analysis of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization and the Consequences of Fetal Personhood. Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees , 32 (3), 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180122000809
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022) and Roe v. Wade (1973) – A Bloated Bureaucracy and an Inclusive Supreme Court Discussion
