Explain how motivational interviewing (MI) differs in tone, structure, and patient engagement compared to traditional interviewing.
Short on Time? Get Expert Nursing Help
Our nursing writers can handle your essay, care plan or case study from start to finish.
… Unlike the traditional interviewing technique, which is authoritative and corrective, motivational interviewing (MI) is empathetic, nonjudgmental, and also supportive. The Engage – Focus – Evoke – Plan structure of motivational interviewing helps achieve the goal of behaviour change in a patient-centred manner. In contrast, the traditional approach of interview follows a linear pattern…
Motivational Interviewing
A provider’s interviewing techniques and communication style can have a significant impact on patient motivation and behavior.
Required Resources
NOTE: Utilize this text as a clinical reference to aid your analysis for the relevant areas noted. Also utilize study questions to develop your understanding of the concepts and topics presented throughout this course.
Soriano, R. P. (2026). Bates’ guide to physical examination and history taking (14th ed.). Wolters Kluwer Health.
Chapter 1, “Foundational Skills Essential to the Clinical Encounter”
Chapter 2, “Interviewing, Communication, and Interpersonal Skills”
Motivational Interviewing – NURS 6512 Module 1 Assignment 1
Chapter 5, “Clinical Reasoning”
Chapter 6, “Clinical Documentation and Oral Presentation”
Chapter 7, “Health Maintenance and Screening”
Chapter 8, “Evaluating Clinical Evidence”
CARDI-OH. (n.d.). Clinician’s pocket guide on motivational interviewingLinks to an external site.. https://www.cardi-oh.org/files/resources/cardi-oh-clinicians-pocket-guide-on-motivational-interviewing.pdf
Kay, J. M. (2025). The nurse practitioner ethicist: Distinct from a nurse ethicist?Links to an external site. Nursing Ethics, 32(8). https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330251350386
Walden University, LLC. (n.d.). Motivational Interviewing–Style History Interview [Video]. Walden University Canvas. https://waldenu.instructure.com
Walden University, LLC. (2026). Traditional, Directive History-Taking Interview [Video]. https://waldenu.instructure.com
To prepare:
Watch a video of two providers interviewing a patient. Motivational Interviewing–Style History Interview Video transcript
Video demonstrates example of standard interviewing techniques versus example of motivational interviewing (MI) using The Process of MI framework:
Engage – Build rapport, use open-ended questions, uncover values/hopes, and offer compassionate reflections.
Focus – Bring the discussion to the health concern at hand, eliciting symptoms, concerns, and wellness indicators.
Evoke – Explore reasons for and against change; use readiness rulers, double-sided reflections, and pros/cons.
Plan – Collaboratively set attainable goals and elicit patient commitment to specific next steps.
Assignment (1–2 pages) – Motivational Interviewing – NURS 6512 Module 1 Assignment 1
Compare the efficacy of each provider’s approach to patient interviewing in regard to effect on patient behavior. Which approach is more effective in helping patients achieve health-related behavioral changes?
Explain how motivational interviewing (MI) differs in tone, structure, and patient engagement compared to traditional interviewing.
Reflect on how you might use MI techniques in your own advanced practice role to promote patient-centered outcomes.
Consider how principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice apply to patient interviewing and communication practices.
Use at least 3 scholarly resources that are less than 5 years old. Cite all sources in APA format.
By Sunday of Week 1
Submit the Motivational Interviewing – NURS 6512 Module 1 Assignment 1.
Submission Information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
To submit your completed Motivational Interviewing – NURS 6512 Module 1 Assignment 1 assignment, save your Assignment as MD1Assgn1_LastName_FirstInitial
Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
Rubric – Motivational Interviewing – NURS 6512 Module 1 Assignment 1
NURS_6512_Module1_Assignment1_Rubric
NURS_6512_Module1_Assignment1_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCompare the efficacy of each provider’s approach to patient interviewing regarding the effect on patient behavior. Which approach is more effective in helping patients achieve health-related behavioral changes?
20 to >17.88 pts
Excellent
Provides a fully developed comparison of the efficacy of each provider’s approach to patient interviewing regarding the effect on patient behavior. Thoroughly explains which approach is more effective in helping patients achieve health-related behavioral changes.
17.88 to >15.88 pts
Good
Provides an adequately developed comparison of the efficacy of each provider’s approach to patient interviewing regarding the effect on patient behavior. Adequately explains which approach is more effective in helping patients achieve health-related behavioral changes.
15.88 to >13.88 pts
Fair
Provides a minimally developed comparison of the efficacy of each provider’s approach to patient interviewing regarding the effect on patient behavior. Minimal or undeveloped explanation of which approach is more effective in helping patients achieve health-related behavioral changes.
13.88 to >0 pts
Poor
Does not provide a comparison of the efficacy of each provider’s approach to patient interviewing regarding effect on patient behavior; comparison is vague, unclear, or inaccurate.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how motivational interviewing (MI) differs in tone, structure, and patient engagement compared to traditional interviewing Motivational Interviewing – NURS 6512 Module 1 Assignment 1.
20 to >17.88 pts
Excellent
Provides a fully developed explanation of how motivational interviewing (MI) differs in tone, structure, and patient engagement compared to traditional interviewing.
17.88 to >15.88 pts
Good
Provides an adequately developed reflection on how they might use MI techniques in their own advanced practice role to promote patient-centered outcomes.
15.88 to >13.88 pts
Fair
Provides a minimally developed reflection on how they might use MI techniques in their own advanced practice role to promote patient-centered outcomes.
13.88 to >0 pts
Poor
Does not provide a reflection on how they might use MI techniques in their own advanced practice role to promote patient-centered outcomes; reflection is vague, unclear, or inaccurate.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflect on how you might use MI techniques in your own advanced practice role to promote patient-centered outcomes.
20 to >17.88 pts
Excellent
Provides a fully developed reflection on how they might use MI techniques in their own advanced practice role to promote patient-centered outcomes.
17.88 to >15.88 pts
Good
Provides an adequately developed reflection on how they might use MI techniques in their own advanced practice role to promote patient-centered outcomes.
15.88 to >13.88 pts
Fair
Provides a minimally developed reflection on how they might use MI techniques in their own advanced practice role to promote patient-centered outcomes.
13.88 to >0 pts
Poor
Does not provide a reflection on how they might use MI techniques in their own advanced practice role to promote patient-centered outcomes; reflection is vague, unclear, or inaccurate.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConsider how principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice apply to patient interviewing and communication practices.
20 to >17.88 pts
Excellent
Provides a fully developed analysis of how principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice apply to patient interviewing and communication practices.
17.88 to >15.88 pts
Good
Provides an adequately developed analysis of how principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice apply to patient interviewing and communication practices.
15.88 to >13.88 pts
Fair
Provides a minimally developed analysis of how principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice apply to patient interviewing and communication practices.
13.88 to >0 pts
Poor
Does not provide an analysis of how principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice apply to patient interviewing and communication practices; analysis is vague, unclear, or inadequate.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse at least 3 scholarly resources that are less than 5 years old.
10 to >8.94 pts
Excellent
Uses 3 peer-reviewed scholarly sources published within the last 5 years.
8.94 to >7.94 pts
Good
Uses 2 peer-reviewed scholarly sources published within the last 5 years.
7.94 to >6.94 pts
Fair
Uses 1 peer-reviewed scholarly source published within the last 5 years.
6.94 to >0 pts
Poor
Does not use peer-reviewed scholarly sources or sources used are older than 5 years.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Attribution and APA Formatting
5 to >4.46 pts Motivational Interviewing – NURS 6512 Module 1 Assignment 1
Excellent
All sources are cited in APA format without any errors.
4.46 to >3.96 pts
Good
All sources are cited in APA format with some minor errors.
3.96 to >3.46 pts
Fair
All sources are cited with frequent APA formatting errors.
3.46 to >0 pts
Poor
Missing source citations and/or minimal adherence to APA formatting rules.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Mechanics, and Punctuation
5 to >4.46 pts
Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4.46 to >3.96 pts
Good
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with few errors.
3.96 to >3.46 pts
Fair
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with frequent errors.
3.46 to >0 pts
Poor
Post contains frequent errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation that interfere with comprehension.
5 pts
Total Points: 100 Motivational Interviewing – NURS 6512 Module 1 Assignment 1
