Back to Module 3: Psychopharmacology for Anxiety and Neurocognitive Disorders
Short on Time? Get Expert Nursing Help
Our nursing writers can handle your essay, care plan or case study from start to finish.
Assignment: Patient Case Scenario: Debate Podcast
This week, you will present and defend an assigned stance (pro or con) and specific medication for a patient case study scenario via podcast recording. Within the podcast, you will also share your perspective on why the alternative medication class would not be appropriate for the patient case scenario.
Support your answers with evidence-based, peer-reviewed scholarly literature.
Note : APA style format with citations and references will apply.
As a reminder, these were the assigned medications:
Pro
Con
Amphetamine
Amphetamine
Methylphenidate
Methylphenidate
Alpha Adrenergic Agonist
Alpha Adrenergic Agonist
Non-Stimulant
Non-Stimulant
Level 2: AI for Study and Planning Support
AI use is required and is to be used for brainstorming, outlining, or studying
You are fully responsible for the final work
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this assessment.
Required Resources
To prepare:
Review the Required Learning Resources.
Review your research regarding your position and medication.
Consider how you will apply your specific position and medication to the presented patient case.
By Sunday of Week 6
Submit a link to a 5-minute podcast for your selected concept, focusing on modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors. You are welcome to be as creative as you want to be, but you should aim to be concise in your delivery. Remember, the more you understand the concept, the more concise you can be with your audience.
Additionally, you must submit a completed AI Assessment Template as part of your submission.
Submission Information – Podcast
To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as MD3Assgn1PT1_LastName_FirstInitial
Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
Next, click on Text Entry tab, and add your Podcast link.
Next, agree to the End-User License Agreement.
Finally, select Submit Assignment for review.
Submission Information – AI Assessment Template
To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as MD3Assgn1PT2_LastName_FirstInitial
Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
Rubric
NURS_6630_Module3_Assignment_Rubric
NURS_6630_Module3_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Shows Photo ID Displayed and Dressed ProfessionallyStudent
10 pts Excellent Photo ID is clearly displayed and faculty are able to identify the student. The student is dressed professionally with a lab coat.
0 pts Poor Photo ID is not clearly displayed (faculty cannot make out the student) or displayed at all. *Student must remedy this or grade will be a ZERO. The student is not dressed professionally with a lab coat.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Podcast discusses student’s stance (either pro or con) on the medication to the presented patient case.
30 to > 26.82 pts Excellent Provides a fully developed discussion of the student’s medication and stance (either pro or con) to the presented patient case.
26.82 to > 23.82 pts Good Provides an adequately developed discussion of the student’s medication and stance (either pro or con) to the presented patient case.
23.82 to > 20.82 pts Fair Provides a minimally developed discussion of the student’s medication and stance (either pro or con) to the presented case.
20.82 to > 0 pts Poor Does not provide a discussion of the student’s medication and stance (either pro or con) to the presented case.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Podcast is supported by evidence-based, peer reviewed scholarly articles and includes AI Submission details.
20 to > 17.88 pts Excellent Uses at least 3 evidence-based, peer-reviewed articles and includes AI submission details.
17.88 to > 15.88 pts Good Uses at least 2 evidence-based, peer-reviewed articles and includes AI submission details.
15.88 to > 13.88 pts Fair Uses 1 evidence-based, peer-reviewed article and AI submission details.
13.88 to > 0 pts Poor Does not use evidence-based, peer-reviewed articles and AI submission details may be missing or incomplete
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Professionalism
15 to > 13.41 pts Excellent The podcast is consistently professional, well-communicated, and easy to follow.
13.41 to > 11.91 pts Good The podcast is mostly professional, well-communicated, and easy to follow.
11.91 to > 10.41 pts Fair The podcast is minimally professional. Some parts are poorly communicated and difficult to follow.
10.41 to > 0 pts Poor The podcast is disorganized, unclear, or incomplete.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Speaker Delivery
15 to > 13.41 pts Excellent Speaker delivery is consistently engaging and clear.
13.41 to > 11.91 pts Good Speaker delivery is mostly engaging and clear.
11.91 to > 10.41 pts Fair Speaker delivery is minimally engaging. Some sections lack clarity.
10.41 to > 0 pts Poor Speaker delivery is unclear or incomplete.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Source Attribution and APA Formatting
5 to > 4.46 pts Excellent All sources are cited in APA format without any errors… All images from sources include proper attribution without APA formatting errors.
4.46 to > 3.96 pts Good All sources are cited in APA format with some minor errors… All images from sources include proper attribution with minor APA formatting errors.
3.96 to > 3.46 pts Fair All sources are cited with frequent APA formatting errors… All images from sources include improper attribution with frequent APA formatting errors.
3.46 to > 0 pts Poor Excludes source citations or shows minimal adherence to APA formatting rules… All images from sources lack attribution.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Time
5 pts Excellent The video does not exceed the 6-minute time limit.
3.46 pts Poor The video exceeds the 6-minute time limit. (Note: Information presented after the 6 minutes will not be evaluated for grade inclusion.)
5 pts
Total Points: 100
